
1.5 Implementation Procedures for:
Committees
STATEMENT
All committees are set up for a specific task within
the university system. Some may be set up for the task of a specific
campus unit, while others are set up for campus-wide issues and
tasks. Regardless of their nature, function and origin, all documents
generated by these committees are crucial to the understanding of
the academic and administrative mission of the university and its
various entities. They provide insight into the evaluation of past
direction and the future course of university units. They are also
important reference documents for future administrative activities.
In some committees, e.g. search and personnel-related
review committees, the deliberations and correspondence document
very candidly expressions of scholarly and professional judgments.
The illumination of these judgments, which make the records highly
sensitive, are, therefore, treated as closed records, contribute
to their value as historical and evidential documentation of the
mission of the university. They are also important reference documents
for future administrative activities.
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COMMITTEE GENERATING THE RECORDS
1. It is the responsibility of each chair
to act as a record coordinator.
2. All activities of special purpose committees
should be documented and those records be transferred at the completion
of the committees' task by the appointed authority in charge of
the committees to the AUARC.
3. The records coordinator (chair of the
committee) should consult at an early stage with the AUARC to discuss
the creation, maintenance, archival retention, and proper transfer
of the committees' records.
4. Records which should be transferred to
the AUARC, depending on the nature of the committee:
4.1 mission statement or charge to the committee
4.2 agendas
4.3 minutes
4.4 substantive correspondence
4.5 reports by the committee
4.6 news releases and public statements
4.7 electronic conference print-outs if
used for committee work.
4.8 lists of candidates considered in the
evaluation process including candidates credentials
4.9 statements of evaluation which document
the selection process
4.10 short list of candidates as recommended
to the hiring authority including candidates' credentials.
For information concerning the responsibilities and procedures of
the Andrews University Archives and Records Center especially in
recognition of the sensitive content of some of these records, see
section II, 1.2 and II, 1.3.
|